Time to lose the last few readers I have left…
Young Rippa has found success with his brand new indie comic company, “Rippaverse”. Naming conventions aside, congratulations! Time to show these industry bastards how to make some real content!
Those would be my thoughts. Rippa went on to talk about how he planned to compete against the likes of Batman, Spiderman, and all other shit that’s gone down the drain as a result of “trying to appeal to zoomers” or whatever else prompted them to completely ruin these beloved characters for one reason or another. But… here’s the thing. I see this news story pop up… on Fox News, and that’s a red flag as far as I’m concerned. Fox, as we all know, is owned by Disney, the very devils that are responsible for the ruination of Spiderman amongst a whole litany of quote “woke” agenda being perpetuated in Marvel comics (in the end, Disney has final say). So… Rippa is competing against Disney in this regard, and I doubt Disney or any subsidiary under them is completely unaware of this. So my question is… why would Fox, owned by Disney, give Rippa any publicity? Competition in this regard would demand that you take attention *away* from the competition because you are battling for readers. The last thing you want to do is convince your audience to go and read someone else’s comics when you have your own to sell, and that someone’s goal is to compete against you for readers.
Now I’m sure people will contend that Disney doesn’t really care about their own comics and just focuses on the movies and tv shows, and that’s a fair argument. But what if Rippa gets big enough to compete on those fronts? Disney would be indirectly responsible for getting him that much attention (and money) by giving him a platform for more profit and more avenues.
Furthermore, Rippa was being promoted as “non-woke” comic company. That boggles my mind because hey, Disney is “all about the woke”. So why in Amma’s name would they promote someone who is against their interests?
I’m not going to go the route of “controlled opposition”, because I like Rippa. Definitely a recommended channel especially in regards to the narc shit that was going down last year, but him being featured on Fox is extremely suspect. As though he were being used to further the interests of Disney or the establishment. Afterall, he was paraded as being “non-woke”.
The last 2 years have had a lot of focus on “wokeness” to the point of exhaustion, so much so that I had to go cold turkey from the internet altogether for the better portion of this year. A lot of that came from “The Batman” fiasco. The Batman was one of the few movies I actually enjoyed. It was a bright spot, a light in the distance, in a sea of crap and ruination of beloved characters that people have unusually decided to become sycophants for (Sonic and Robotnik primarily, but mainly Spiderman), and I felt like perhaps there’s still some good left in the world of entertainment. But low and behold, the internet had to ruin that as well. Zoe Kravitz wouldn’t be my first choice to play Catwoman, but neither would Robert Patterson for Batman as he’s just a wee bit too small (I actually think he’d make a decent Leon Kennedy for a proper Resident Evil movie, wouldn’t you guys?), but they both manage to do a decent job in their roles, the more grounded world of the movie benefits them more than otherwise, but… all that comes to a screeching halt when Catwoman goes “all this city cares about are these white priviledged people”, and man, you’d think it was the Jax Ending all over again. Course the difference is you didn’t have the option to avoid the dialog like you would a videogame ending. With the mild outrage expressed by the usual suspects, I’m surprised Ron De’Rangetos didn’t put forth a lawsuit for Warner Bros. You had people talking about how it “took them out of the movie”, some talked about how the movie “demonized white people”, and I’m like “good lord! I reviewed that Power Rangers movie years ago, thinking how everyone had to be united by (black) billy getting killed being subtext, and as retarded as that sounded, I sound RATIONAL compared to these guys!” Because of that one line, the WHOLE DAMN MOVIE was demonizing white people. Jax’s ending was Warner Bros promoting White genocide, Warner Bros is going to be on everyone’s shit list by the time America falls, I swear.
So you know, I had to block this shit out. “I don’t need this”. Admittedly, this wasn’t the only reason I went AWOL (MHW addiction, killed by Iceborne’s shittiness), but it was probably the main reason. The internet is hyper obsessed with the culture war, obsessed with defeating “wokeness” that all other activity must STOP until the war is won. Wokeness is the greatest evil to ever curse the entertainment industry as well as politics and SJWs and every other piece of jargon Americans can think of to be “outraged” over because most of us have nothing better to do like preserving population numbers (which is likely why there’s so much yt outrage)
First off, since when did “wokeness” actually refer to forced representation of different groups? Originally, it pertained to Black people being aware of the shit that this country (and others) have done and continue to put us through. As far as I can tell, it’s just another black thing that white folks appropiated, redefined, and “included” everything else under it’s label. Women and minorities taking over roles from the white guys is no longer “SJW” but is “woke”. Couple of years back, I had made a statement that “people flip shit to mean any goddamn thing they want”. Good lord, I did not think I would be vindicated in as little as 2 years! I don’t even hear “SJW” being thrown around anymore! But that’s exactly the point. The… “establishment” (which includes outrage youtube echo chambers) took black verbiage and misapplied it to SJWism as a means to conflate awareness of black issues with forced overrepresentation in media. Not a single person can actually describe what’s so woke about “Captain Marvel” based on it’s original application simply because there is no connection. Woke is just a buzzword these bastards use, much like “politics”, without actually knowing what the word means. Captain Marvel is “feminism”, not “woke”. This always seems to be a thing, (yt) people always conflate black issues with women’s rights or gay rights or some other bullshit so they can excuse themselves and divert their attention away from black issues so as to further ignore and perpetuate them. So in reality, what’s really going on is that people are speaking out against wokeness, IE speaking against awareness of black issues, without even knowing it (or caring since… “fuck ni***rs anyway” right?). Part of me believes this all came about from the George Floyd riots (notice how police are starting to get more convictions lately, but oh no, the riots were just senseless violence), hench the increased backlash and misapplication of the term. Much like the LA Riots, Yt folks saw the summer of love as a loss. So now they’ve gone on a war of deception by taking black verbiage and making it an umbrella term for all things SJW, overrepresentation and all. People like Anomaly Inc. freely uses it to describe Phase 4 of the declining MCU. Sorry, “M-She-U” (It’s called “Feminism”, you dolt)
All I can think is that if the Boondocks was made today, it would never be as popular as it was. Or the X-Men for that matter. Boondocks was one of the “wokest” cartoons of the late 2000s, and was one of the most beloved shows ever created. I can’t imagine it being made today and doing half as well as it did. But this was made during a time when Black Issues weren’t exactly at the forefront of American discussion, they were still mostly backroom talks where all we did was vent about the shit. Now? Boondocks would be considered “overkill” since there is actual fighting going on. The difference that I’m seeing is that… we’ve had “woke” shit for years. The difference is that now people are “acting” rather than “thinking and talking”. The yt power structure is being challenged daily, the status quo is crumbling, and the demographics are shifting. Key on that last part. I’ve seen a lot of reports (mileage may vary on accuracy) about how yt population numbers are on a decline (considering all the mass shootings, sounds about right), and for a while, I saw the “overrepresention” outrage as a reflection of those shifting demographics. So the kind of shit we’ve had before without complaint, NOW it’s a problem because the status quo is being challenged! Female versions of popular male characters, no one hated them until now. Black versions of popular white characters, I’m sure there was a grumble or 2, but less than what Miles Morales got (probably because he’s part hispanic). But hell, Black Panther was an original black character, and people tried to shit on the massive success of that movie as merely riding the coattails of the MCU (Because No Way Home wasn’t riding the coattails of Raimi and Webb, I’m sure). I’d be more inclined to say the whole “make original black characters” argument is more so license to freely ignore those original characters as they’re brand new and have no base, but well established WHITE characters being turned black (nothing new) well that’s “forcing us to pay attention to them, and we don’t want that!”
But I digress. This whole “anti-woke” movement, Ronny’s “Stop Woke Act” where he’s threatening the jobs and financial well being of teachers, it’s all in response the fact that the status quo is being challenged. So they have to make “woke” an all encompassing umbrella term for everything they despise about modern entertainment so as to discourage people from taking on a similar mindset. And you know for everything Yt people want to do, they have to put a black face on it. I have no doubt that they want to use Rippa in this regard since they mostly talk about him being “Anti-Woke”. Nevermind that he’s competing against the likes Marvel which is against Disney’s interest so the publicity is counter-intuitive as all fuck, but when you have a war to win, sacrifices must be made.
One thing that you will notice amongst the echo chambers of youtube is they use “success” as a form of intimidation. Because people want success above all else. I’ve said it before that the Entertainment industry is deliberately making SJW (bad representation) content with the explicit intent of undermining the very concept of “representation” at all. Taking established characters and established stories out of their original context to “push the narrative” is done to make the very notion of “representation” unworkable and undesirable. So when we get to these success stories, they can say “Hey libtard/democrat/rightist/SJW/woke bitch/whatever the fuck broad jargon we use, you wanna make content featuring characters that tackle the internal problems of American Society and Government, well you better think again! You’ll never reach the heights of these guys over here if you plan on being super woke!” That was the idea behind the slogan “get woke, go broke“. But wait. Boondocks was woke. Chappelle’s show was woke. Fresh Prince was woke. Black Panther was woke. Hell if you want to go there, NIKE was woke for a while, woke enough to cause a minister to cut up a nike head band in a church. They all found success despite their wokeness.
“But that’s because 3 of those things are popular because they’re comedies, and one of them was attached to the MCU!”
So you can find success despite being “woke”?
“NO! GET WOKE, GO BROKE!”
See, the actual issue is that all of the examples I mentioned go into REAL problems that are “naturally” brought to people’s attention. A lot of “issues” brought up in mainstream comics aren’t massive issues, but are forced into the discussion “inorganically“. It doesn’t feel natural to the stories at all, and oftentimes goes against the characters themselves for a forced narrative that is clumsily weaved into the universe (That He-Man show definitely applies). That isn’t “woke” at all, that is but a parody. The idea that people should find any problem with American society is “laughable”, but is done in a context that is subtle, and the reaction comes strictly from the audiences instead. Thus the audience (and accompanying influencers on youtube) become the mouthpieces for that idea. A very devious form of “social engineering” that people did not pick up on.
This is how you get these hyper-aggressive outrage influencers on youtube who go on multiple self-congradulatory dick swinging festivels where they literally jerk themselves off by pwning ignorant college students in intellectual debates. The idea is to show one side of a…. “debate” as being successful consistently while showing the other side as being perpetual losers. Then they conflated that with “wokeness” so that the perpetual losers would be mixed in with Black issues. Somehow, everything gets looped back to black people eventually, like the SJW operation was a trial run to dismantle black arguments without actual engagement. “We gotta demonize wokeness because the ni***rs are getting woker by the day!” The showing of force, of ownership in debates, and of success of “anti-woke” content are all intimidation tactics. By the way they’re presenting their anti-woke platform, they’re trying to convey a message of strength by whatever means necessary, NOT towards the industries that produce the quote “woke” content that they despise so much, but to discourage similar patterns of thinking in regular individuals. Corporations will do whatever they please because they’re too big to fail and haven’t given a fuck about audiences for years.
Now don’t take this the wrong way, but what I’ve started to notice, particularly when it comes to american (yt) audiences, they operate more so on Principal than they ever have on Preferences. They often talk about not supporting companies that put out Woke (read-SJW) content, but will instead put their money towards indie creators who do not make said woke (SJW) content. And a LOT of indie “non-woke” creators have blown up as a result! When I watched discussions of these non-woke things (like Kamen America), the discussion of actual “quality” never came up. It was the “success” that was important. The success would be an automatic declaration of quality. Yes, feel free to call me a hypocrite. I’ve earned such ire. But continuing, they only talked about the fact that this shit was successful. So what’s being conveyed here is that people… don’t actually care about the quality, they care enough to send a message. We’ve long determined that the money isn’t important to the entertainment industry anymore, so it’s a failed gesture of power, but these… “lunatics” are so desperate to prove a point, they will shit out money for anyone that doesn’t make woke content. And that’s how you get to these success stories.
So what I’m seeing is a skewing of the message. Mainstream comics aren’t bad because the stories are crap, they’re bad because of their messages. That’s what’s actually being conveyed. You could make a damn good story with lovable characters all damn day, but the moment you go woke, everything sucks (or so they want you to think). They still like the The Batman movie, but they didn’t know how to take the “White Priviledge” thing, like do they eviscerate the movie or do they give it the benefit of the doubt? That’s the problem. Because they’re so desperate to “destroy the bastion of wokeness“, they’re actually perpetuating a problem with modern entertainment. You don’t need actual quality to be successful. You just need some sort of gimmick. Either you focus strictly on comedy, special effects, cameos from other movies, or in this case, just being “non-woke”. One of yahs was shocked that I didn’t give Venom 2 it’s dues since it “defeated Wokeness” or something, but the truth is I couldn’t give a fuck. Venom 2 was a shit movie that ruined Carnage and had to remind me of that pipsqueak they dare call a “Spider-Man” or “Nathan Drake”. But that’s the problem! We’ve flipped the standards of entertainment based strictly on principals rather than preferences! You’ll support Venom 2 because it beat out the… the gays or some shit, idk. You’ll support the piece of shit Sonic movies because of a character design change OR because it angered Angered SJWs in regards to the Harley Quinn Birds or whatever the fuck it was called, WE DON’T CARE ABOUT QUALITY! We care about whether or not the shit has a political message to ignore and just “be a movie”. Where in Amma’s name are the standards in that!? We are comfortable in the destruction of further quality so long as it doesn’t have politics or wokeness or whatever Jargon dictionary these dipshits can pull out of their asses to describe what they don’t like.
And why is that? Why is quality and substance no longer viable factors of success? This ain’t like the old days where gimmicks still existed, people still wanted good movies, but nowadays, being good isn’t important at all. Now success is predicated strictly on whether or not the work is “woke”? I’d wager that this has more to do with, again, the yt power structure. You see… “Wokeness”, in it’s proper context, focuses on and criticizes the yt supremacist power structure of America that harms Black People by design. SJWism is an exaggeration and fabrication of problems created by American (YT) Culture that places constraints on the society as a whole. Legitimate or otherwise, both concepts are a critique of Yt People as Yt people are the weavers of American and European society. Things do not move without the say so of Yt people. If you are non-yt and want a change in the society, you’re fighting an uphill battle without a significant level of “force”, this was proven with the George Floyd riots of 2020 that they’re still pissed off about. A power structure of any sort is unfeasible without some form of legitimacy. Yt people have a media apparatus that constantly gives them that form of legitimacy. Through imagery, they can weave the message that Yt people are the wisest, most level headed, and most rational people in the world while all others are too emotional to make the tough choices. They’re the better fighters, they’re the better tacticians, and they’re the most moral people you could find. This engineers the society to see yt people as the only legitimate group in America. It’s been that way for a while, and only in short bursts does this perception get challenged. It’s very difficult to challenge those that you have been, to put it bluntly, “mind fucked” into believing is righteous and legitimate as you’ll be looking to them to validate your arguments as well.
What’s been happening lately, however, is a consistent, decade long, push back against this form of engineering. Nowadays, Yt people are no longer seen as “exclusively” legitimate. We have a whole litany of “diverse” imagery being infused, whether naturally or by force, into popular media, while Yt culture, yt people, are being criticized constantly. Now this shouldn’t be considered “wrong”. No one group wants to be singled out and chastised for their cultural failings.
But… here’s the thing. Boondocks and Black Panther, both “woke” productions… had FAR MORE CRITICISM for black people than they ever did for white people! And Black People STILL love those works! It doesn’t bother us that Aaron McGruder is far more critical of black people than otherwise, even wanting to make a damn Uncle Ruckus movie (praise Amma THAT didn’t happen), we still watch the shit, and mostly agree with the criticisms that are levied. But… comics and movies that also criticize Yt culture, these are things to be DEMONIZED! Oh no, you are NOT going to levy complaints and criticisms against Yt society! Oh no! I’ve yet to see any tv shows or movies delve into the mass shootings of elementary schools and other areas of activity (mostly because the majority of perps are Yt), and I doubt I ever will. If they exist, my bad. But see, from how Yt audiences are responding to the “influx of SJWism”, the quality isn’t their concern. Never has been, never will be. The fact is that Yt society is being QUESTIONED! Being CRITICIZED! Being CHALLENGED!! Thus, the media they created has gone off course. It’s no longer being used to acclimate people to the acceptence of their power structure, but rather to legitimize and normalize other, marginalized groups in America. This is more so a THREAT to their power structure, because if people see less legitimacy in Yt people, they are less willing to accept what Yt society deems important, deems necessary, etc.
This is where all this outrage is coming from. The knowledge that the status quo is dying, Yt people losing their legitimacy, and other groups basically… “taking over” in their minds. Criticism of Yt society is a loss of power. This pushback of teaching history in schools under the notion that “it makes Yt people feel like shit” is a rather egregious example of this, I don’t know a time when history was supposed to make you feel good about something rather than to learn how the world came to be. This is the outrage. The status quo is dying. And then you got Ron DeRangetos threatening to sue teachers for teaching history, that… that’s teetering on the edges of Fascism, ain’t it? But that’s another tenet of the Power Structure. “Sacrifices are necessary to maintain the power“.
All in all, it’s awesome that Rippa is finding success in his new company. But if Fox(Disney) is parading him around, then make no mistake, his work is useful for their agenda, and we just need to keep an eye on them. Rippa’s a great person and I don’t want this to be the case, but… yah know?! It’s just a little suspicious, on the part of Disney now, that they would give their competition publicity. There’s an ulterior motive going on here, and we just need to keep our radars up.